Â
Â
This book is dedicated to Esther M.
Bonaparte. The picture on the front cover is her christening day photograph.
She was born October 24, 1914, to Agnes Cree and Frank Cook of Akwesasne. The
picture is exemplary of the dichotomy she grew up with. She is dressed in her
Roman Catholic christening gown and swaddled on a Native cradleboard. It shows
her growing up in “Mohawk” culture and living in an English world. At one point
in her life, she married a white man but
never was seen equal to whites.
She was a member of the St. Lucy's Catholic
Church in Syracuse, NY and a member of the Kateri Tekawitha
Circle. Additionally, she was a founding member of the North American Indian
Club of Syracuse
On October 9, 2005, Esther Margaret Bonaparte passed away at the age of 90 years
old. Her children include Joyce (the late
Richard) Kelso of Ogdensburg, Honora Anne Bonaparte, Gary (Jessica) Bonaparte
of Syracuse, Sheree Peachy (Richard Skidders) Bonaparte, Tami Bonaparte of
Akwesasne and daughter in-law, Helen Falcone. Loving grandmother of Keli, Rick,
Arron, Jason, Erich, Cheavee, Tasha, Tara, Ahtkwiroton, Stephanie, Ietsistohkwaroroks,
Matthew, Ciele, Konwahontsiawi,
Karonhiotha, Adam, Zoo, DonJon,
Iaonhawinon, Tehrenhniserakhas,
Taylor, Ienonkwatsheriiostha, Colton, Cheya, Sako. Ella, Marcey, Elcey, Jasper, Maverick,
Darryl, and Havoc; and 23 great-grandchildren. She is survived by many nieces,
nephews, relatives, and friends.
Predeceased by her husband, Hubert Bonaparte and former husband, William Brenno; two sons, Allen and John Bonaparte; one grandson,
Daryl Bonaparte; one granddaughter, Katsi-bear; five
sisters, Louise Bigtree, Theresa Cree, Mae Syron, Harriett Sielawa and Ann
Barnes; one brother, and Tom Cook.
Â
One
last important note, Esther was an avid New York Yankee Fan!
Â
Â
Â
As I was preparing to write my dissertation
there were two areas I was interested in. One
was the minority population of Germans living in Poland after World War Two,
the other was the Mohawks of Akwesasne
and their interaction with the federal governments that surround them. The thrust of this book is one close to my
heart. It comes from a combination of being a Cultural Historian, the fact that
my wife and her extended family are Mohawk with many still living at Akwesasne,
and finally my affinity for those cultures being oppressed by more powerful
cultures.
I have always loved history even at a young
age and I think it’s because I like stories. Many times, I encounter students
that will tell me, “they don’t like history,” or that it’s “boring.” I tell them that history is just that, a
story. As in any account of any story, there are main characters, plots and
sub-plots, and in most cases the perception of good and bad. The history of the
division at Akwesasne is such a story. I have a deep interest in the history of
different cultures. In particular, the
minority culture that is enveloped within a major culture.
In 1989-1990 my family and I were living
outside Ogdensburg, NY. The conflicts occurring at Akwesasne consumed the
interest of everyone in the North Country. Roads had to be blocked and detours
were needed to get from Massena to Malone, NY. My wife’s extended family, being
from Akwesasne gave me a unique insight
into the impact of the event. The occurrences were discussed at the time with
family members who often spoke about the effect it had on families on and off
the reservation. Part of my family was involved
also. My sister used to charter tours with Peter
Pan Bus Lines from Rochester, NY to the Mohawk
Bingo Palace at Akwesasne. We visited with my sister and brother-in-law at
Flanders Inn in Massena, NY. This is where the excursion group would stay each
night and then be shuttled each day to the reservation. My sister told me how she would advertise,
charter the bus and would get the group together. The Reservation was the
closest gambling opportunities at the time. People would come to Akwesasne from
Rochester and Syracuse, NY and Ottawa, Ontario as well as other locations in
the region. At times gun fire would
erupt and busses were fired upon. Not everyone on both sides of the reservation
embraced the new gambling on the one US side. Being connected to these events
in so many different ways, the fact that different cultures were involved, and
the historic significance of the event all piqued my historical curiosity.
The separation of the Mohawks of Akwesasne
begins in a practical way beginning in the Nineteenth Century. Their reservation
was “legally” divided after the War of 1812 because of the Jay Treaty. The
Mohawks still suffer from being divided by two national governments and three
provincial/state governments. Tribal governmental systems are imposed on either
side of the border by the paternalistic United States and Canadian governments.
This imposition has divided the Mohawks of Akwesasne by more than just the St.
Lawrence River but by borders imposed upon them.
This book is a reflection of what occurred
in 1989 -1990 at Akwesasne and the history that propelled those events. It
starts with Mrs. Annie Garrow walking down the road
about two miles from her house on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River to Hogansburg, NY. A trip she had made many times. She was
carrying some baskets to sell. Her walk never took her off the reservation, she
didn’t have to cross the river. But she crossed a border that was imposed upon
the Mohawks. It would lead to a US Supreme court and start a situation that
eventually leads to the 1989-1990 uprising the Mohawks found themselves in.
Some have said
that this was just a Mohawk Civil War, others have said that it was a squabble
amongst the Mohawks over who was making money and who was controlling it. The
book proposes that a system that was imposed on the Mohawks failed. If the
Natives had their traditional government or at the very least a unified
government that governed the entire territory,
I predict this would never have escalated to the point of destruction and death.
However, with the territory divided, two different governments and five
administrative districts enforcing laws, the outcome was violence.
In general, no race, creed. or color has
been more oppressed or had genocide committed against them as the Native American
of the Americas. From the 15th century to the 18th
century 95% of the Native population was exterminated. Scholarly estimates of
Native American population loss are as high as 100 million. Where did they go?
They didn’t move, they were killed by disease (at times intentionally spread),
enslaved and worked to death by the European invaders, or just killed as one
would kill a bothersome coy-dog. The Natives that were left were coerced into
leaving their land. This was typically accomplished through promises in
treaties, none of which were eventually kept. In the case of Akwesasne, treaties imposed a border that
wasn’t there.
Are there different interpretations of the
cause of the uprising in 1989 -1990, of course? However, as Robert A. Rosentstone tells us in his book, History of Film, Film on History, "No matter how much research
we do, no matter how many archives we visit, no matter how objective we try to
be, the past will never come to us in a single version of the
truth."Â That is certainly true of this uprising at Akwesasne. The
research that went into deciphering the history of the 1989-1990 uprising and
placing it in a chronological order can be found in the appendix.
Â
Â
Â
This work’s genesis is my doctoral
dissertation Clash of Cultures: Uprising
at Akwesasne. There are a number of individuals I want to thank for their
critique of my dissertation and therefore the creation of this book. My wife
and partner Keli (Keli Rugenstein, Ph.D.) is the
first I would like to thank. She has read and reread this manuscript numerous
times and put up with my late nights as I wrote both the dissertation and the
reworking of it into this document. Without her support, I doubt I would have
been able to finish.
I would further like to thank those who were
instrumental in the creation of this work, offering input and suggestions. They
include Professor Dan S. White, Ph.D. of
the University at Albany, SUNY, Patricia West-McKay Ph.D. who is Co-Director of
the Center for Applied Historical Research at the University at Albany, SUNY
and who is also Director of the Martin van Buren National Historic Site of the
National Park Service. Dr. Arlene Sacks, Ed.D., Chair of my Doctoral Committee
and Director of the Graduate Programs at the Florida campus Of Union Institute and University (The Union Institute), was similarly a
contributor to the book.
Others who have read over the manuscript
and have offered feedback include Charles (Chaz) Kader and Doug George-Kanentiio both from Akwesasne. A thank you goes out to Stephen
R. Walker Designs for his help with my book cover. Finally, I want to thank my
sons Don and Ernest Kristoph who gave up time with
their Dad so that he could do research and write.
Â
Â
What Uprising, Where? Akwesasne?
Â
During 1989 and 1990 there was an uprising
at Akwesasne (the St. Regis Indian Reservation) near Massena, New York and
Cornwall, Ontario. The event was marked by violence and death, with large
amounts of property and infrastructure destroyed or damaged, and families and
friends torn apart. Others who were
involved went to prison, were fined, or went into self-imposed exile to escape
the pressures of the aftermath.
(Figure 1. Map of Akwesasne and the
Surrounding Area. Page 113)
Â
The reservation sits on both sides of the
St. Lawrence River. Approximately two-thirds of the reservation lies on the US
side of the border and one-third on the Canadian side.
Akwesasne is located in part of two counties of New York State and two Canadian
provinces and interacts with five different jurisdictional governments. The
indigenous Mohawk culture is surrounded by and interacts with five larger
cultures: the French Canadian, the English Canadian, northern New York (along the St. Lawrence River) and the cultures
of both federal governments. Akwesasne has two independent, elected tribal
councils that govern the Canadian and American sides respectively.
There are two generally accepted theories
why the uprising occurred. One theory is that the problems of 1989 and 1990
were a continuation of an ongoing feud between the Mohawks and the US and
Canadian federal governments. This feud
centered upon the issue of Mohawk sovereignty, the right of free and easy
access across the border, control of their land, and the ability not to be
charged duties or taxes for crossing the border.
Other sharp controversies arose from time to time, but these were the issues
that caused the most friction. However, there are a few differences between the
uprising at Akwesasne and the other government interactions of the past. In this uprising, traditional friends and
cohorts were split down non-traditional party lines. Not only were there splits
among historic allies; previously opposing sides on all other issues formed an
alliance on this one. The major
differences in the 1989 through 1990 uprising were the loss of lives at
Akwesasne, and later at Kanesatake, (near Oka),
Canada and the lawlessness and violence that occurred.
The other accepted theory for the violence
at Akwesasne is it was a civil war over the issue of gambling, much like the US
Civil War involved the issue of slavery. The situation was exacerbated by the
response of the state, provincial, and federal governments involved, and their
initial reluctance to get ensnared in the situation.
There
is a yet an unexplored theory for the conflict and violence. The historical record indicates
increasing conflict between the various cultures at Akwesasne since the 1950s. This intensified in 1989 and reached a peak in
mid-1990. During 1989, the Canadian government, the provinces of Ontario and
Québec, the US federal government, and New York State ignored requests from the
elected Canadian and American tribal governments for assistance. Despite this,
the elected tribal governments were still encumbered by the rules and regulations
of their respective federal governments and jurisdictional considerations. The
external cultural and jurisdictional restraints prevented the tribal
governments to combine to settle the problems that developed at Akwesasne
during this time.
By 1990, the various governments realized
the seriousness of the situation but the one authority that had the greatest
ability to act, New York State, did not do so until after the loss of
life. The weight of this prolonged cultural conflict on Mohawk society
was evidenced by the destruction of infrastructure and the blockading of roads
and death. When examining the events at Akwesasne psychologically, the
situational stress of the situation caused people to act out and became violent. As the stress and
anxiety increased people acted violently. This scenario created stress resulted
in the Mohawks acting out in a predictable manner, striking out at others. As
the various systems involved broke down, stress and anxiety increased through
all of the systems.
Â
Â
Â
Â
To understand the situation at Akwesasne,
it is important to review and understand the various jurisdictions and
institutions that are encountered on the reservation. These institutions include
various governmental, police and investigative agencies with their associated
federal, provincial or state and tribal jurisdictions. Examining the Government
at Akwesasne, includes an assessment of the Longhouse/ Traditionalist
government, the Canadian Mohawk government, the American Mohawk government, and
the Warriors. Additionally, there is a need to investigate the relationship
between the United States federal government and Akwesasne and between the
Canadian federal government and Akwesasne.
Akwesasne is surrounded and divided by two
federal jurisdictions: The United States and Canada. Additionally, the
reservation must contend with the governments of New York State and the
provinces of Ontario and Québec.
Residents of the reservation have three area codes: 613 that covers Southeast
Ontario, 514 covering Southwest Québec, and 518 covering Northeast New
York. Each serves a different portion of
the reservation. This division is echoed by zip codes; the American side’s zip
code is 13655 and the Canadian side is H0M 1A0. The
population of this multi-jurisdictional community is about 13,000 people. Because of this unique situation, school
students are also affected. Some children from the US side of the border go to
Canadian schools, and all or some Canadian children go to US Head Start
programs.
There are three competing self-governments
on the reservation loyal followings; the Canadian Mohawk Council of Akwesasne,
the St. Regis Mohawk Tribal Council, and the Longhouse Mohawk Nation. Traditionalists from both sides of the
reservation follow the rituals and traditions of the Longhouse government
however the federal, state, and provincial governments do not officially
recognize the Longhouse government. The St. Regis Mohawk Tribal Council
oversees “funding programs from Washington and Albany” and interacts with the
US side of the reservation.
The Mohawk Council of Akwesasne connects with Ottawa for Canadian programs and
agendas. Each recognized council has its band (membership) lists for its
community. Technically, residents of the reservation cannot vote for both councils,
however, there is nothing to stop a resident from one side of the reservation
from moving from one voting roll to the other.